What do you do when the house of cards you built start tumbling down on you and the entire country starts defecting “en masse” from your political ideology? Well, if you’re a republican, you blame the victim.
Recently, conservatives have begun attacking progressive housing advocates like ACORN and CRA, blaming it for the recent financial crisis and suggesting that the law forced lenders to make irresponsible loans to underserved communities. They actually want the public to believe that it was poor and working class people - and not Wall Street fatcats - who caused the massive $700 billion bailout passed by Congress last week!
Talk about class warfare.
First of all, I can’t imagine that every poor and working class man, woman and child in this country owns anything close to $700 billion in assets. That would be akin to blaming a kindergardner for his parent’s running up his parent’s credit card. Even if the child did get a few outfits from his parents spending spree, who was responsible for signing the receipt? Who determined the interest rate charges? And who decided how much - and how often - to spend?
Most analysts agree, adjustable rate mortgages on overvalued homes (that rapidly depreciated when the housing market bubble burts) is responsible for this financial crisis, not loans on the modestly priced homes in urban neighborhoods.
I guess I should be encouraged that neocons are in full-fledged panic mode and are resorting to the most ridiculous of arguments to shore up its eroding political base, however, as Media Matters reports, mainstream media seems to be tripping over themselves to give credence to this ridiculous blaming the victim:
· The Politico’s Daniel Libit uncritically repeated New Gingrich’s claim that Democrats wanted “provisions to provide money” to ACORN in the bailout bill despite his colleague Ryan Grim’s having noted earlier that ACORN was not specifically directed any funds (9/30/08).
· On Fox & Friends, Steve Doocy said there was a “story” out there that Democrats wanted to give ACORN “20 percent of those almost trillion dollars.” Guest Ken Blackwell called it a “classic payoff” (10/01/08).
· In a Washington Times column, Mona Charon wrote that Democrats “managed to find time to slip language into the bailout legislation that would provide a dandy little slush fund for ACORN” (10/01/08).
· On Lou Dobbs Tonight, Dobbs claimed that ACORN would “reap hundreds of millions of dollars” from the bailout bill (9/29/08).
· Michael Savage, on his nationally syndicated radio show, said we didn’t need the latest version of the bailout bill because “they put in money for La Raza and ACORN” (9/29/08).
· Rush Limbaugh claimed that ACORN “forc[ed] banks to make hundreds of millions of dollars in ‘subprime’ loans to often uncreditworthy poor and minority customers” (9/29/08).
· A New York Post editorial accused ACORN of using “intimidation tactics” and “public charges of racism” to extract “hundreds of millions of dollars in loans and contributions from America’s financial institutions” (9/29/08).
· An American Spectator article claimed that after the CRA came into effect, ACORN got into the “shakedown business” and accused them of demanding more government spending on social programs, a higher minimum wage, and gun control (9/29/08).